An MASc thesis must:
- be no more than 70 pages,
- give evidence of mastery of the topic, originality and creativity and
- be written and defended in an acceptable manner.
It is desirable that the work reported in the thesis be of such a nature and caliber that it can be published. It should contain sufficient information so that others can replicate the experiments conducted.
With approval from the student’s supervisor, a student may submit a collection of publishable papers as their thesis. This collection must have a coherent topic with an introduction, presenting the general theme of the research and a conclusion, summarizing and integrating the major findings. The minimum requirement is one paper submitted to a good quality, peer-reviewed journal, where the student is the principal contributor.
MASc Departmental Oral Examination
MASc students must successfully defend their thesis at an MASc Departmental Oral Examination.
The student and supervisor work together to form the committee, set the examination date, time, and location. Meeting rooms can be booked through the ChemE Main Office.
The MASc Oral Examination Committee is comprised of:
- Supervisor(s); and
- 2 additional Faculty Members, 1 of whom must be from this Department. The graduate office will appoint one of these two members to Chair the exam.
Students must submit the MASc Oral Examination Form at least 5 business days prior to the examination in order to formally request the examination.
Distribution of Thesis
Copies of the thesis should be distributed by the student to the exam committee members at least two weeks in advance of the exam date. A PDF of the student’s academic record from ACORN must be included with the thesis. Committee members may refuse to participate in an exam if less time is given for appraisal of the thesis.
Conduct of MASc Oral Examination
- The student will be asked to leave the room.
- The Examination Chair will review the departmental policies related to the MASc program.
- The committee will review the student’s course performance.
- The candidate and any graduate student observers will be asked to enter the room.
- The student will make a 20 minute presentation on their research.
- The exam committee members will question the student on their research. Student observers may also ask questions.
- At the end of the question period, the candidate and observers will be asked to leave the room.
Post Exam Review
Based on the thesis and oral defense, the committee may recommend that:
- The thesis be accepted as is and candidate be awarded the MASc degree.
- The student be awarded the degree subject to minor modifications of the thesis.
- The student be given the opportunity to address shortcomings in their thesis or defense with the objective of reconvening the oral exam at a later date.
Admission to the PhD Program
The student’s qualifications for the PHD program are reviewed at the exam. The committee reviews qualification based on the following factors:
- A student wishing to proceed to the PhD program is normally expected to complete the MASc program in four consecutive sessions (16 months).
- The student must obtain a B+ average across all courses towards the degree. Students failing a course would not normally be eligible for proceeding to a PhD program. Exception can be given only for courses extra (EXT) to the degree.
- Although no official grade is given to the thesis and its defense, the overall B+ average required by SGS at the master’s level for proceeding to the PhD program will be taken into account.
Student Discovery Award
The Students Discovery Award (SDA) was established in 2013 to encourage publications by graduate students, to set clear expectations in graduate programs and to help reduce time to completion.
- MASc Students – $1,500
- PhD Students – $3,000
- Successful thesis defense at the MASc Departmental Oral Exam within two years of entry into the program.
- Successful thesis defense at the PhD Departmental Oral or Final Oral Examination within five years of entry into the program.
- The student should have made substantial contributions to their research field. Specifically, the student should have authored/co-‐authored at least one qualified paper per year in the program at the time of departmental oral. The qualified papers normally include first-‐authored ones that have been published, accepted or submitted for publication in refereed journals at the time of departmental oral. Non-‐first-‐authored papers are considered and counted as 0.5 of first-‐authored papers.
- Students with fewer papers but having high impact contributions (publications and patents et al.) are also eligible and encouraged to apply.
- Eligible papers for a specific program (MASc or PhD) must be prepared from the work done during the years in the same program. For example, papers from one’s MASc thesis but published during one’s PhD program are not eligible for a PhD-‐SDA.
To apply, the candidate must submit a list of publications and a one-‐ page impact statement to the examination committee at the time of departmental oral.
Evaluation and Recommendation
The application is evaluated by the oral examination committee. A recommendation form will be submitted to the graduate office following the exam by the exam Chair.
The final approval is made by the Chair of the department.
Once any modifications/corrections have been made and the supervisor has approved the thesis, the corrected thesis must be submitted according to the requirements below: